The effect webpage body keyword location has on ranking in search engine results: an empirical study.

Kritzinger, W.T. & Weideman, M.

Published Online

Kritzinger, W.T. & Weideman, M. 2005. The effect webpage body keyword location has on ranking in search engine results: an empirical study. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town. Online: http://web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo/

ABSTRACT
The growth of the World Wide Web has spawned a wide collection of new information sources, which has also left users with the daunting task of determining which sources are valid. Most users rely on the web because of the low cost of information retrieval. Other advantages of the web include the convenience in terms of time and access as well as the ability to easily record results. It is also claimed that the web has evolved into a powerful business tool. Examples include highly popular business services such as Amazon.com and Kalahari.net. It is estimated that around 80% of users utilise search engines to locate information on the Internet. This of course places emphasis on the underlying importance of web pages being listed on search engines indices. It is in the interest of any company to pursue a strategy for ensuring a high search engine ranking for their e-Commerce website. This will result in more visits from users and possibly more sales. One of the strategies for ensuring a high search engine ranking is the placement of keywords in the body text section of a webpage. Empirical evidence that the placement of keywords in certain areas of the body text will have an influence on the website's' visibility to search engines could not be found. The author set out to prove or disprove that keywords in the body text of a web page will have a measurable effect on the visibility of a website to search engine crawlers. From the findings of this research it will be possible to create a guide for e-Commerce website authors on the usage, placing and density of keywords within their websites. This guide, although it will only focus on one aspect of search engine visibility, could help e-Commerce websites to attract more visitors and to become more profitable.
REFERENCES
  1. Abels, G., White, DM., Hahn, K. 1997. Identifying user-based criteria for web pages. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 7(4), 252 -262.
  2. Aguillo, I. 2000. A new generation of tools for search, recovery and quality evaluation of World Wide web medical resources. Journal of Management in Medicine. 14(3/4), 240-248.
  3. Alimohammadi, D. 2004. Measurement of the presence of keywords and description meta-tags on a selected number of Iranian web sites. Online Information Review. 28(3), 220-223.
  4. Alimohammadi, D. 2003. Meta-tag: a means to control the process of web indexing. Online Information Review. 27(4), 238-242.
  5. Ambergreen Internet Marketing Ltd. 2005. http://www.ambergreenInternetmarketing.com/index.shtml [28 September 2005].
  6. Beal, A. 2003. Optimizing Keywords for Search Engines. http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2168011.
  7. Benbunan-Fich, R. 2001. Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site. Information & Management. 39(2),151-163.
  8. Bowman, J.L. 2004a. Optimization with Keywords. http://spider- food.net/keywords.html.
  9. Bowman, J.L. 2004b. Search Engine Optimization and Coding. http://spider-food.net/keywords-c.html.
  10. Brinkley, M., Burke, M. 1995. Information Retrieval from the Internet: an evaluation of the tools. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 5(3), 3-10.
  11. Clay, B. 2004. Search Engine Optimization. http://www.bruceclay.com/web_rank.htm.
  12. Cockburn, C., Wilson, T.D. 1995. Business use of the World Wide web. Information Research, 1(1) Available at: http//informationr.net/ir/1- 2/paper6.html
  13. Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. 2003. Business research methods. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education Publishing.
  14. Cooper, M.D. 2001. Usage patterns of a web-based library catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2),37.
  15. Courtois, M.P. & Berry, M.W. 1999. Results ranking in web search engines. Online, 39-46
  16. CyberAtlas. 1999. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.cyberatlas.com
  17. Eldabi, T., Irani, Z., Paul, R.J. & Love P.E.D. 2002. Quantitative and qualitative decision-making methods in simulation modeling. Management Decision, 40(1):64-73.
  18. El-Sherbini, M., Klim, G. 2004. Metadata and cataloguing practices. The Electronic Library. 22(3), 238-248.
  19. Ford, N., Miller D., Moss N. 2002. web Search Strategies and retrieval effectiveness: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation. 58(1), 30-48.
  20. Green, D. 2000. The evolution of web Searching. Online Information Review. 24(2), 124-137.
  21. Guenther, K. 2004. Getting your website Recognized. Online. 28(3).
  22. Hall, P. 1999. The Internet as business enabler. South African Journal of Information Management. 1(2/3).
  23. Hamalainen, M., Whinston, A. B., & Vishik, S. 1996. Electronic markets for learning: education brokerage on the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 51-58.
  24. Henzinger, M.R., Motwani, R. & Silverstein, C. 2002. Challenges in web search engines. SIGIR Forum, 36(2).
  25. Hirsch, R.P. & Riegelman, R.K. 1996. Statistical Operations: Analysis of
  26. Health Research Data. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science.
  27. Introna, L. & Nissenbaum, H. 2000. Shaping the web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. Information Society, 16(3):169-186.
  28. Konia, B.S. 2002. Search Engine Optimization with webPosition Gold 2. Wordware Publishing Inc, Plano, Texas.
  29. Lowley, S. 2000. The evaluation of WWW search engines. Journal of Documentation. 56(2), 190-211.
  30. Meadhra, M. 2004. How keywords impact search engine rankings. http://www.builder.com.
  31. Microsoft. 2004. Optimizing for the correct Keywords. http://www.submit-it.com/subopt.htm?tipq=2&sell_page=1.
  32. Mouton, J. 2003. How to succeed in your Master's & Doctoral Studies: A South African guide and resource book. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria, South Africa.
  33. Moxley, D., Blake, J., Maze, S. 2004. web search engine advertising practices and their effect on library service. The Bottom line: Managing Library Finance. 17(2), 61-65.
  34. Nielsen, J. 2004. Statistics for Traffic Referred by Search Engines and Navigation Directories to Useit. http://www.useit.com.
  35. Nobles, R., O'Neil, S. 2000. Maximize web Site Traffic: Build web Site Traffic fast and free by optimizing search engine placement. Adams Media Corporation, Holbrook, MA.
  36. Notess, G.R. 1999. Rising relevance in search engines. Online, May/June, 23(3):84-86.
  37. Podesta, G. 2000. e-Commerce: Helping Customers Gain the Competitive Edge. Plastics Engineering, July:73-74.
  38. Ritchie, K. 2000. Reasons why dot coms fail: how to avoid the pitfalls of e-Business. http://www.ktb.net [accessed 21 November 2003].
  39. Rowland, G. 1998. Getting more from the Internet. New Library World. 99(6), 222-229.
  40. Roy, S. 2005. Top 10 Search Engine Positioning Mistakes. Search Engine Guide. http://www.searchengineguide.com
  41. Simeon, R. 1999. Evaluating Domestic and international web-site strategies. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 9(4), 297-308.
  42. Singh, A.M. 2002. The Internet - strategies for optimal utilization in South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management. 4(1).
  43. Smith, A. 2003. Think local, search global? Comparing search engines for searching geographically specific information. Online Information Review, 27(2), 102-109.
  44. Struwig F.W. & Stead G.B. 2001. Planning, designing and reporting research. Pearson Education Publishing. South Africa.
  45. Synder, H, Rosenbaum, H. 1999. Can Search Engines be used as tools for web-Link Analysis? A Critical Review. Journal of Documentation. 55(4), 375-384.
  46. Sullivan, D. 2003a. Ending the debate over cloaking. http://www.searchenginewatch.com/sereport/print.php/34721_2165231.
  47. Sullivan, D. 2003b. How Search Engines rank web pages. http://www.searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167961.
  48. Sullivan, D. 2002a. Search engine placement tips. http://www.searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2168021.
  49. Sullivan, D. 2002b. Intro to Search Engine Optimization. http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167921
  50. Sullivan, D. 2000. WebPosition Gold. http://www.lambdesign.co.uk/wpgold/product-reviews-dlr-LambDesign.htm
  51. Thelwall, M. 2000a. Effective websites for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 7(2), 149-159.
  52. Thelwall, M. 2000b. Commercial web sites: lost in cyberspace? Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(2):150-159.
  53. Thelwall, M. 2001. Commercial web site links. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2):114-124.
  54. Thelwall, M. 2002. Subject gateway sites and search engine ranking. Online information Review. 26(2), 101 - 107.
  55. Thurow, S. 2003. Search engine visibility. New Riders, IND,
  56. Tyner, R. 2001. Sink or Swim: Internet Search Tools and Techniques. http://www.ouc.bc.ca/libr/connect96/search.htm.
  57. Weideman, M. 2005. [Online]. Available WWW: http://www.mwe.co.za/seaarticles.htm (Accessed 13 April 2005).
  58. Weideman, M. 2004a. Empirical evaluation of one of the relationships between the user, search engines, metadata and web sites in three-letter .com web sites. South African Journal of Information Management. 6(3).
  59. Weideman, M. 2004b. Ethical issues on content distribution to digital consumers via paid placements as opposed to website visibility in search engine results. In proceedings of ETHICOMP (Syros, Greece 14-16 April), Volume 2, 904-915.
  60. Weideman, M. 2002. Effective application of metadata in South African HEI websites to enhance visibility to Search Engines. In proceedings of The 4th annual Conference on WWW Applications (Bellville, South Africa 4-6 September), CD-ROM.
  61. Weideman, M., Kritzinger, W. 2003. Search Engine Information Retrieval: Empirical Research On The Usage Of Metatags To Enhance website Visibility And Ranking Of E-Commerce websites. In proceedings of The 7th World Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (Orlando, Florida, USA, 28-30 July), Volume VI, 231-236.
  62. Wikipedia. 2005a. Dot-Com. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_com
  63. Wikipedia. 2005b. Electronic commerce. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_commerce
  64. Wikipedia. 2005c. Online shop. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shopping
  65. Wong, M. 2004. Mike's marketing tools. http://www.Mikes-Marketing- Tools.com.
  66. Zhang, J., Dimitroff, A. 2005a. The impact of webpage content characteristics on webpage visibility in search engine results (Part I). Information Processing and Management, 41, 665-690.
  67. Zhang, J., Dimitroff, A. 2005b. The impact of metadata implementation on webpage visibility in search engine results (Part II). Information Processing and Management, 41, 691-715.
  68. Zhang, J., Dimitroff, A. 2004. Internet search engines' response to metadata Dublin Core implementation. Journal of Information Science. 30(4), 310-320.
Full text of Thesis No 0042: The effect webpage body keyword location has on ranking in search engine results: an empirical study.

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrieval

Back to Home page