SEO vs PPC: A Model To Determine The Most Effective Digital Marketing Budget Division

Weideman, M.

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences.

Weideman, M. 2017. SEO vs PPC: A Model To Determine The Most Effective Digital Marketing Budget Division. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences. 09 September-10 September. Istanbul, Turkey.

ABSTRACT
Many search engine marketing campaigns channel most of the budget towards pay-per-click (PPC) schemes, with a small fraction going towards search engine optimisation (SEO). This research aimed at finding the best way to allocate a marketing budget across these two platforms. Firstly, a comparison was made between high-ranking websites to see how PPC and SEO respectively have been applied. It was found that an investment in SEO was seldom made. Secondly, the cross-over point between expenditure on the two systems was determined in a case study. It was determined that the website traffic crossed over after around three months, and the expenditure after six months. From this point onwards SEO became more cost- effective. Finally, the cost per acquisition (CPA) was determined for both PPC and SEO. Results show that the CPA for SEO was significantly lower than for PPC, in all the test cases investigated. In conclusion, a dual approach is proposed. A model was designed, which could be applied to design a cost-effective search engine marketing strategy. When applying this strategy correctly, expenditure will be reduced and yield increased.
REFERENCES
  1. AMBERGREEN INTERNET MARKETING LTD. Internet growth. 2005. Access from: http://www.ambergreenInternetmarketing.com/index.shtml
  2. BUGHIN, J., CHUI, M., MANYIKA, J. Ten IT-enabled business trends for the decade ahead. McKinsey Quarterly. 2013, 13 May.
  3. BURNS, E. e-Commerce spending up for 2007 holiday and year. 2007. Access from: www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=clickz_print&id=3624408
  4. CANZIANI, B.F., Welsh, D.H.B. Website quality for SME wineries: measurement insights. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 2016, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 266 – 280. doi: 10.1108/JHTT-02-2016-0009
  5. CLARKE, T.B., CLARKE, I. A competitive and experiential assignment in search engine optimisation strategy. Marketing Education Review. 2014, vol. 24, no 1, pp. 25 - 30.
  6. CLARKE, T.B., JANSEN, B.J. Conversion potential: a metric for evaluating search engine advertising performance. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. 2017, vol. 11, no. 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-07-2016-0073
  7. FARNEY, T., TONYAN, J. Measuring the Success of Your Social Media Presence with Google Analytics. Library Technology Reports. 2016, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 38 - 42.
  8. GARCÍA, MdM.R., GARCÍA-NIETO, J., ALDANA-MONTES, J. An ontology-based data integration approach for web analytics in e-commerce. Expert Systems with Applications. 2016, vol. 63, pp. 20 - 34.
  9. GREEN, D. The evolution of Web Searching. Online Information Review. 2000, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 124 - 137.
  10. GUPTA, A., MATEEN, A. Exploring the factors affecting sponsored search ad performance. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2014, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 586 - 599.
  11. HÄMÄLÄINEN, M., WHINSTON, A.B., VISHIK, S. Electronic markets for learning: education brokerage on the Internet. Communications of the ACM. 1996, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 51 - 58.
  12. HOTCHKISS, G. Inside the mind of the searcher. 2004. Access from: http://www.enquiro.com/research.asp
  13. JANSEN, B.J., SCHUSTER, S. Bidding on the buying funnel for sponsored search and keyword advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1 - 18.
  14. JERKOVIC, J.I. SEO Warrior. USA: O’Reilly Media, 2010. Access from: http://books.google.co.za/books?id=KzzXzqLzXi8C
  15. KENNEDY, K., KENNEDY, B.B. A small company’s dilemma: using search engines effectively for corporate sales. Management Research News. 2008, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 737 - 745.
  16. KILLORAN, J.B. How to use search engine optimisation techniques to increase website visibility. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 2013, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 50-66.
  17. KRITZINGER, W.T., WEIDEMAN, M. Parallel search engine optimisation and pay-per-click campaigns: A comparison of cost per acquisition. South African Journal of Information Management. 2017, vol. 19, no. 1, http://www.sajim.co.za
  18. KRITZINGER, W.T., WEIDEMAN, M. Comparative case study on website traffic generated by search engine optimisation and a pay-per-click campaign, versus marketing expenditure. South African Journal of Information Management. 2015, vol. 17, no. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v17i1.651
  19. KRITZINGER, W.T., WEIDEMAN, M. Search Engine Optimization and Pay-per-Click Marketing Strategies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 2013, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 273 - 286. doi:10.1080/10919392.2013.808124
  20. LUH, C.J., YANG, S.A., HUANG, T.L.D. 2016, Estimating Google’s search engine ranking function from a search engine optimization perspective. Online Information Review. 2016, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 239 - 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0112
  21. MARKS, T., LE, A. Increasing Article Findability Online: The Four Cs of Search Engine Optimization. Law Library Journal. 2017, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 83 - 99.
  22. MILLER, M. The ultimate web marketing guide. Indianapolis, IN: Pearson Education, 2011.
  23. MINIWATTS MARKETING GROUP. Internet usage statistics for Africa: Africa internet usage and 2016 population stats. 2016. Access from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm
  24. MINIWATTS MARKETING GROUP. Internet usage statistics: The Internet big picture: World Internet users and population stats. 2011. Access from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  25. MORENO, L., MARTINEZ, P. Overlapping factors in search engine optimization and Web accessibility. Online Information Review. 2013, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 564 - 580.
  26. MOXLEY, D., BLAKE, T., MAZE, S. Web search engine advertising practices and their effect on library services. Managing Library Finances. 2004, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 61 - 65.
  27. NABOUT, N.A. A novel approach for bidding on keywords in newly set-up search advertising campaigns. European Journal of Marketing. 2015, vol. 49, no. 5/6, pp. 668 - 691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2013-0424
  28. NEETHLING, R. User profiles for preferences of search engine optimization versus paid placement.Master's Thesis, 2008. The Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.
  29. OLBRICH, R., SCHULTZ, C.D. Multichannel advertising: does print advertising affect search engine advertising. European Journal of Marketing. 2014, vol. 48, no. 9/10, pp. 1731 - 1756.
  30. PANDA, T.K. Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers? The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 2013, vol. XI, no. 3, pp. 56 - 66.
  31. SEN, R. Optimal Search Engine Marketing Strategy. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2005, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9 - 25.
  32. SINGH, A.M. The Internet – strategies for optimal utilization in South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management. 2002, vol. 4, no. 1. http://www.sajim.co.za/
  33. THELWALL, M. Commercial Web site links. Internet Research. 2001, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 114 - 124.
  34. VAUGHAN, L. Discovering business information from search engine query data. Online Information Review. 2014, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 562 - 574.
  35. VISSER, E.B., WEIDEMAN, M. An empirical study on website usability elements and how they affect search engine optimization. South African Journal of Information Management. 2011, vol. 13, no. 1. http://www.sajim.co.za/index.php/SAJIM/article/view/428
  36. WEIDEMAN, M. Website Visibility: the theory and practice of improving rankings. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2009.
  37. WEIDEMAN, M., KRITZINGER, W.T. 2003. Search engine information retrieval: empirical research on the usage of metatags to enhance website visibility and rankings of ecommerce websites. Proceedings of the 7th world conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. Orlando, Florida, USA, 2003. VI: pp. 231-236.
  38. YANG, Y., ZHANG, J., QIN, R., LI, J., WANG, F. A Budget Optimization Framework for Search Advertisements Across Markets. IEEE Transaction On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 2012, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1141 - 1151.
  39. ZHANG, S., CABAGE, N. Search Engine Optimization: Comparison of Link Building and Social Sharing. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2017, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 148 - 159.
  40. ZHANG, J., DIMITROFF, A. Web search engines’ response to metadata Dublin Core implementation. Journal of Information Science. 2004, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 310 - 320.
  41. ZUZE, H., WEIDEMAN, M. Keyword stuffing and the big three search engines. Online Information Review. 2013, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 268 - 286.
Full text of Conference Proceedings No 0055: SEO vs PPC: A Model To Determine The Most Effective Digital Marketing Budget Division

Digital Library with full-text of academic publications on website visibility, usability, search engines, information retrievalhttp://web-visibility.co.za/website-visibility-digital-library-seo/

Back to Home page